Animal Rights Activists vs. Victims of Terrorism

Some animal rights activists have long been proponents of using the methods of terror — destroying buildings and other property to push their political agenda. But in the wake of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, some animal rights activists chose to show just how callous they were toward human life.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals had to weigh in, of course, although the organization seemed to have a quick change of heart. The day after the attacks, PETA issued a press release on its web site which was yanked off the site almost as soon as it had been put up.

Although national news media were reporting that phone service in New York City was suffering under the weight of people concerned about relatives not to mention the ongoing rescue work which had various local, state, and federal authorities staggering to keep up, PETA actually urged people to call Mayor Rudolph Giuliani to express their concerns about abandoned pets. In the press release, PETA said,

Mayor Giuliani has a poor record when it comes to animals. In 1998 he refused to allow desperate New Yorkers whose apartment building’s scaffolding collapsed, the opportunity to tend to or rescue their beloved animals for more than five days, leaving animals to become dehydrated and starving.

Please urge Mayor Giuliani to set up a task force to locate and rescue animals in need. To many of this disaster’s victims and their families, these beloved animals are members of the family and would be a great source of comfort.

It then gave both the phone and fax numbers to Giuliani’s office adding, “If you have a difficult time getting through to Mayor Giuliani due to phone line trouble, please don’t give up; keep trying.” Yeah, they might actually be on the phone trying to arrange to find survivors — clearly PETA’s priorities were far more important than that.

Given the situation on the ground in New York City, such a telephone campaign had the real possibility of endangering human life and has to be one of the more sickening efforts to ever emerge from that sick organization.

Meanwhile, Gary Yourofsky actually tried to top PETA in the level of absurdity. Many Americans have opened their hearts and wallets during this crisis and donated in excess of $100 million to the Red Cross (Amazon.Com alone collected $6.4 million in donations for the Red Cross within a week). Many people also sought to donate blood, in many places quickly overwhelming the ability of volunteers to keep up.

Is this an example of the best of America? According to Yourofsky, people who donate to the Red Cross are simply perpetuating terrorism. In a press release Yourofsky wrote,

Sorry I didn’t post this last week, but The American Red Cross engages in the terroristic, murderous and unscientific practice of vivisection.

It is my personal belief, too, that the Red Cross is making out like bandits over the recent tragedy. You can bet the upper management Red Cross people will be receiving HUGE bonuses after the public sends in tens of millions if not hundreds of millions of dollars because of the WTC/Pentagon attacks.

DO NOT SUPPORT the RED CROSS in any way until it refuses to torture, terrorize and murder animals in unscientific and unethical experiments.

There are other ways to donate blood besides via the Red Cross. Local hospitals or county clinics can take blood donations, too. Be careful about hospitals, though. Many of those institutions engage in vivisection, too. County clinics are your safest bet.

Yourofsky is right about one thing. The Red Cross does participate in some medical research involving animals, and thanks to animal research many of those who likely would have died of their injuries were saved thanks to the incredible advances in drugs, surgical practices, medical devices and other innovations.

Just one more thing to thank them for.

Sources:

Red Cross experiments on animals – DO NOT DONATE. Gary Yourofsky, ADAPTT Press Release, September 19, 2001.

New York City’s Animals Desperately Need Your Voice. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Press Release, September 12, 2001.

They Should Have Bombed the World Trade Center on a Sunday!

The things that Lexis-Nexis searches turn up often boggle even my cynical mind. The Rocky Mountain News, for example, ran a very brief editorial item on September 16 about the philosophical connections between animal rights and anti-globalization activists and the terrorists who caused so much grief on September 11.

The Rocky Mountain News was outraged by a comment that appeared in a Wall Street Journal story which interviewed anti-globalization activists for their reaction to the bombing. One San Francisco-area activist actually told the Journal,

We’re supercritical of the terrorists’ scorn for human life. Why couldn’t they done what they did on a Sunday? There are always ways to make allowances for people’s lives.

The Rocky Mountain News comments that, “Anyone who suggests that shattering the World Trade Center with a hijacked jet on a Sunday night might be considered a concession to civilized norms needs to be under the care of a psychiatrist.”

Indeed, one would suspect the validity and accuracy of the Wall Street Journal quote were it not so completely consistent with the direct action philosophy — as long as it only hurts property, the activists claim, it is not really violence. If the terrorists had managed to take out the World Trade Center without taking any lives but their own, this would have been just as valid a political statement as fire bombing laboratories or smashing in the windows of a local McDonald’s.

One of the upshots of the World Trade Center attack is likely to be an increased media emphasis on all acts of terrorism. Animal rights and environmental terrorists have largely been able to fly under the radar of national attention. The destruction of buildings at the Vail Ski resort received national attention for a few days, but for the most part terrorist acts by groups such as the Animal Liberation Front or Earth Liberation Front have been largely ignored by national media, having been relegated to being local affairs.

Hopefully, this will begin to change as the media and public realizes that the fear and trepidation many of us now feel is something that many medical researchers, animal agriculturalists and others have been living with for years.

Source:

Bankrupt explanation. The Rocky Mountain News, September 18, 2001.